Why Some of the Make Money Online Courses Lose Me Right There
By Marika on May 1, 2011 in Reviews
While earlier on I used to get and gabble in every course I could find (well except for the $2000 courses, obviously, due to lack of those kinds of funds), these days, especially since the Panda update, I’ve become much pickier on what I keep - and what I ask a refund for.
Let’s just take one of the newest courses on the market right now, called Extreme Niche Empires. I’m going against the tidal wave right now because if you check out the reviews at the WF on this course, it’s 5 stars and everyone loves it. But if you also check indepth who bought and talked about this course, well, it’s mostly the newbies. But what on earth I’m talking about and why don’t I like this latest Sean Donahoe’s course? Afterall I did buy a few ones before, including his Backlinks Booster which served me well for about a year, until it finally stopped working and I moved on to another way to index my backlinks.
So I get the course (videos and some plugins) and start watching the videos. Sean Donahoe is an expert on video marketing and he’s quite a good salesman too, he really knows to persuade his prospects.
Basically this course is about creating your own niche empire, which is what he calls it a ‘an authority autoblogging’ system. While initially I didn’t want to buy it due to the fact that it is about autoblogs, the many rave reviews on the WF convinced me against my better judgement.
One (actually two) of the better videos of this course is the one on keyword research and also market research. It’s good, and if I were a newbie at it all, I’d definitely learn a few things about it. There was nothing new for me in there, obviously going to Quantcast.com to learn about your prospect demographics is one of the first thing we all need to do in our keyword research, but for a newcomer, this video is really good. So where did all go wrong in my book?
Well, after the Panda update, Google is all about quality content. And to be honest since the course was done in April if I’m not mistaken, I was pretty sure he actually tackled that. Based on his keyword research video, I was almost sure I’ll find a video on how to write content CATERING to that prospect and making a really great article worthy of Google out of all this. And that video did get me quite curious on how he’s gonna use that information about the prospect to target them…afterall what’s the point of making an indepth research if you’re not gonna use it afterwards?
Instead..when it came to the content video, he clearly admits that he doesn’t like to write articles and he suggests going to Textbroker for $5 articles. This was my first signal that something was wrong. I mean I’ve been using Textbroker before for my small Xfactor sites, but c’mon, this is one of the last sites you should use now that quality has been redefined in Google’s eyes.
And then I got to see two of the articles that he posted on his autoblog. They were typical fluff articles going something like this: (paraphrase to not give away the niche he’s talking about)
If you have this x problem, you need to find a good treatment that will help you overcome this problem. Without the treatment, your problem will be there and you will suffer from it. Thus make sure that you research for a good treatment for X problem. You can find many treatments for X problem if you only search for them’ (or something to that extent).
Both of the articles shown in the video have the same ‘high quality’ information, organized through Textbroker for $5. And that, in post-Panda times. Seriously.
And here is where I’m really confused. What’s the point of the market research to know your prospect, male or female, x age, married (or not), with kids (or not), with x type of income, all written nicely down on paper, if you then go ahead and order articles from Textbroker for $5 a piece? HOW are you using this particular information in the cheap articles that you then put on your website to target that particular type of people, coz I haven’t found it anywhere. The articles are basically made from keywords that are searched from the Google Keywords tool and then given to Textbroker to write around them.
Funnily enough, that video on market and keyword research was one of the best of the entire course.
And sadly, this is just one such course that promises big things (especially now with the whole Panda thing looming above us) and fails to deliver. It definitely didn’t help me create a better website that the visitors are proud to go to and Google is proud to show on its first page.
And no, no affiliate links for this course from me.












Hi Marika,
Yes, I can totally relate to that. Reviews are very subjective and we cant rely on them. I`ve had good products that gets bad reviews and bad products that gets good reviews. The thing is we have to put a lot of effort to buy first then go thru the courses
Grande
Grande | May 3, 2011 | Reply
Hi Marika,
Your experience is so similar to many “shiny things” I bought on the Warrior Forum. I’m really thankful that I’m back with SBI as I know that their insistence on slow but sure and no such thing as get rich quick is the right path for me.
My regret is that I got seduced by the Warrior Forum and for 3 years went from one offer to the next wasting my time. I’m now back with SBI and I feel proud of what I’m doing now in IM. Best to you,
Jerry
Jerry Patterson | May 4, 2011 | Reply
Hey there Marika,
Great Stuff, good to see someone write a honest review once in a while. I totally agree with you why do Quantcast market research and then just order random articles from Textbroker. But with the Panda update and all that I think its quite a bit of scare tactics also. There is a lot of junk still ranking. And from a technical standpoint i don’t think it will be ever possible to program a search engine bot that can filter out “badly” written content”. But its good that search engines are trying hard to do that. You have also to realize that Matt Cutts is a “car sales man” for Google. He says the things he wants people to believe. Don’t get me wrong he is great but you need to filter what he says at times.
But anyways the main point is not to write for SEO junk or not junk writing for people. And if we want to get good conversions then good written no fluff content is essential anyways. But just for ranking I don’t think that great written articles is needed. Oki English is not my first language have a great day
MrMatts | May 10, 2011 | Reply
From 2011 contents are considered as king.Unique contents are the life of the website.
mith from Ssteam showers | May 11, 2011 | Reply
Great content, thank you for sharing =)
Allan | May 18, 2011 | Reply
I’m like you, I bought Sean’s Backlink Booster when it first came out and used it until the crackdowns in Ping.FM basically killed it.
In one of the emails with their tech support, they said they actually use it to submit to a network of several hundred self hosted Wordpress sites. They were supposed to be updating it with an XML-RPC poster, but I don’t know what happened with that.
I hadn’t even heard about this WSO, I don’t really look at that forum much.
As for Google being able to tell the “quality” of the site, I don’t agree with that. It’s a search engine based on algorithms, not an English teacher. If you mean article length, word level complexity, etc., I may agree with you. But even then, Google can’t tell how engaging an article is.
If he has a decent network of sites, I have a hard time believing he doesn’t have his own article writers. Why would you keep going to Textbrokers?
Anyway, I don’t know what his strategy is, but I do use niche autoblogs as part of a second to third tier of sites.
Would I do it for my money sites? No.
Carla from niche marketing | May 27, 2011 | Reply
Well maybe it’s not exactly about the ‘quality’ but more in terms of LSI keywords, theming. A $5 article is a basic one on the main keyword and a lot of ‘fluff’ keywords. Sure, Google is not an English teacher but I’m pretty sure they have something in place to see how many of these fluff phrases they have in a 500 words article for example, and how many theming, related keywords are featuring on that page. A good, well researched article will have more similar keywords than a basic Eza type of article.
Just a small example, let’s say we’re talking about meditation. In a good article you might also come across ‘meditation techniques’, ‘meditator’, ‘meditation sessions’, ‘yoga’, ’spirituality’ ’stress relief’, and so on. The more of these an article will have, the more themed it is because it means that it actually talks about indepth on the subject and with more useful details. If the article is a basic one that you do find at Textbroker, how many of related such word structures you will find? I bet not that many…
Just an idea to ponder about…
Marika | May 27, 2011 | Reply